Skip to main content

On a Sailing Ship by Caspar David Friedrich

I would like to write about a painting that I have been contemplating, Caspar David Friedrich's On a Sailing Ship.
A man and woman sit aboard a boat in a dark ocean headed toward land. The porcelain colored city in the distance is bathed in a soft light. It is close enough to be real to them, but distant enough for the atmosphere to make it dreamy and insubstantial. 
        Look at how the man's jacket ripples as though he were a continuation of the sea. To his darkness (tonally and metaphorically), the woman is the light. He is one with the dark forbidding sea; she, her dress the color of clay, represents land and home and safety on a solid earth.  She is perched up hopefully. The man, with slumped but straightening shoulders, looks up at land with similar longing, but as though as at a hope that is less real to him. This dynamic between the characters tells us that she is the greater moral strength between the two. The fact that she is in the light while the man is in shadow tells us that her strength has some connection to the illumination in the sky. 
         The light in the clouds sits somewhere between the boat and the city.  Many artists have used sunlight as a symbol for hope and the dawning future, but Friedrich uses it in a special way. A typical artist might have placed it directly behind the city, connoting a glowing evanescent heaven. By putting the light between the foreground and background, Friedrich suggests that this light is moving ahead of the ship and pulling it along. Friedrich, himself a deeply religious man, might have considered this the light of God reigning over the sea and land, lending a beacon to those who venture too boldly into his creation. Abstracting from the specifically Christian interpretation of this element, we can view it as a kind of will, or living intelligence inherent in nature. A will which precedes and guides our own. 
          Friedrich communicates a tremendous wealth of information through this composition—much more than I have mentioned here—and everything he says is in the concretes of the painting. This is not an illustration of something we already knew, it does not require previous knowledge or even an explanation. We see the lesson that the artist is teaching us. We see it in those attributes that he has isolated in his portrayal, and these attributes are stressed by the absence of all the thousands of attributes a scene such as this might possess in real life, but which Friedrich has chosen to omit. As Ayn Rand said in "Art and Sense of Life," 
[An artist] selects those aspects of existence which he regards as metaphysically significant—and by isolating and stressing them, by omitting the insignificant and accidental, he presents his view of existence. His concepts are not divorced from the facts of reality—they are concepts which integrate the facts and his metaphysical evaluation of the facts. His selection constitutes his evaluation. . .
         There have been very few artists in history who live up to the role that Ayn Rand was describing in this quote, very few men who relied on nothing but the picture they created to communicate that picture's meaning. This principle, which Ayn Rand did not identify until the 20th Century, was a central aspect of an art movement  that was born at the end of the 18th. The school was Romanticism, and Friedrich was among its most towering figures.


          I would like to add as a purely personal note that I love this painting. I don't agree with its religious premise, but as an integration of thought and image, it is just simply a marvel to behold. Its colors and brushstrokes especially are a feast for the eyes. Notice how the blues and greens of the sea seem to "float" on the underpainting of brown. See the almost melodic harmony of the brown, gold and green in the mast and sail, and how the sequence of vertical lines that compose these objects provide a rhythm that send your eye flying into the sky. The brushstrokes of the sky are each a distinct mark and they radiate out in a concentric ripple. The texture created here is unusual, and resembles the inconsistent nap of a carpet. This gives the spread of clouds a realness, a stressed physicalness that unites them with the sea below and further concretizes Friedrich's metaphysics—specifically his feeling that all of the world is an integrated unity, that spirit and nature are one. True, Friedrich believed in God, but a God that is in Nature, not beyond it. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How to Paint a Landscape in Oil

This is a landscape painted with oil on paper. It was painted from a photograph and the subject is a pond in Central Park. The visual theme is "distance" and all of my choices were made in order to communicate and stress the illusion of space.  The painting was made in four layers, with a few days between each one to allow the paint to dry. I am going to describe the process of each layer. STEP 1 The first step is to block in the large shapes. This is a means of mapping out the composition, choosing which objects will be included and which omitted. The exact tones used at this stage are not absolutely critical but are an approximation of the target colors. Since they will serve as a substrate for subsequent layers, I mixed them lighter and duller than my target colors. That way they won't dominate subsequent layers by showing through and altering the color of those layers—at least no more than I want them to. STEP 2 The next layer of paint is ...
4 comments
Read more

Carolus Duran, John Singer Sargent and the "Indispensable" in Art

  Carolus Duran taught that, “In art, all that is not indispensable is unnecessary." Carolus Duran,  Mademoiselle de Lancey I agree with Carolus, but the word "indispensable" is hard to define in art, and basically amounts to: that which is important to the artist . As such, it is difficult to tell how strictly Carolus adhered to his own principle. Especially in portrait art, an artist is inundated with the particulars of his sitter's personality, and does not necessarily have free reign to paint only that which he cherishes. Nevertheless, Carolus Duran proved canvas after canvas that he was devoted to producing clear, essentialized images. Duran,  Spanish Woman His student, John Singer Sargent was equally devoted to this idea, particularly in regard to the depiction of tones, which was Duran’s special insight and concern in teaching. Duran taught that: “Objects in nature relieve one against each other by the relative values of light and shade which accompany and are...
Post a Comment
Read more

Edgar Alwin Payne's Landscape, Canyon de Chelly

Edgar Alwin Payne,  Canyon de Chelly , specific date unknown, ca. before 1947      Nature falls into the happy rhythm of human steps in this beautifully romanticized oil painting by Edgar Alwin Payne. The cliffs provide the wanderers a pleasant shade, while the clouds shine benevolently in the sky. The shadows in the background are like children peeking around corners to see what the grown-ups are doing.       The way the light rakes across the rock face, it makes the cliffs appear to be follow the wayfarers around the curve of the valley. The way the rocks sink back into themselves counters this forward rhythm and creates the impression that they are reluctantly curious about the horsemen. The clouds overhead seem less connected to the wanderers but are playful with each other. Continuing the horizontal rhythm of the rock walls, the clouds have a peculiar shape that draws one in to wonder what Payne was trying to communicate. Though the clouds s...
Post a Comment
Read more